Don't worry. Not everyone knows it...

Sometimes small-small changes in our code really makes a huge difference to a performance. There are many tips and tricks available and among those, one I am going to discuss over here. I'll be talking about  String vs StringBuilder. One needs to be very careful while playing with strings because memory wise there is a huge impact of strings. I  know, there are lots and lots of articles available on net on String and StringBuilder, but still I am going to show this, using some statistics. Here I am taking Fx 4.0 C# console application with different static methods to showcase my analysis.  Basically what I am doing here is, I am having a String variable named  outputString  and just looping that for 1000 times and concating the string to variable outputString.  Please note, concatenation is done using + symbol. So, what happens internally is, whenever concatenation is done using + symbol, every time, new String object is created. So, as with my snippet. Here I am  lo

Today I was just doing net surf and came across one interesting question 'Can progress event of BackgroundWorker execute after completed event'. At first I thought no, but when I tried this with Console application, I was also able to reproduce this issue. Now question is, how come this scenario occurs in Console app and not in Windows form. Pretty interesting, right ? Now coming to Windows form, this issue will never occur, due to message queuing support. Windows message queue takes very good care of execution sequence of the events. This clearly mean that the progress event may run after the DoWork has completed, but the completion event will always happen afterwards. Another interesting thing here is the SynchronizationContext, which helps in maintaining all these sequencing. But when talking about Console application, none of the above holds true. There is no SynchronizationContext installed and the events just end up in getting run in threadpool thread, which doesn&#

Recently I came across an error "Resource name can not be used more then once". Apart from this, error message was not showing any other information, not even line number, file name, nothing. Generally such errors came, when there is any duplicate key present in resource file, but in my case, I was not using any resource file also. So, there is no chance of duplicate keys also. I tried to hit my head many times for some online help, but no luck :( One thing I noticed was, after building my solution (it was in VS2010) for 3-4 times continuously, error was thrown. Please note, I was just building the solution, without doing any modification in my code or in any of the files. Still I didn't get any clue. So, finally I thought to remove one one project from my solution and build. Till 4-5 projects I removed and I didn't get any clue till yet. Suddenly I found that, Obj folder is added to my solution explorer. This obj folder holds all temporary files with few .resour

In day-to-day life developers use to write huge logic involving many braces ({,}) in the code. Reaching to end/start of any condition gets complex as the lines of code increases. To simplify the same, one can use key combination of Ctrl+]. To use the given key combination, place the cursor on any brace and hit Ctrl+]. If the brace is an end brace, the control will move to the matching brace i.e. start brace of the condition and vice versa. Also the same key combination can be used to navigate to the matching comment (/*, */) or region (#region). In these cases, the cursor position should be on the comment or the region respectively. Hope this helps !!! CodeProject

As we all know, Exception handling plays a very important role in any developer’s life. When talking about exception handling, throw is the first thing, which comes into our mind. Today, we will see, how actually throw works. The given code catches the exception and just throws it again, without passing any explicit Exception object.  Now, let’s take another version of this above code: This given code will create the object of Employee and will catch the exception and from catch block it will throw the catched exception via ex (our Exception class object). Now question is how these two code snippets are different. For more analysis, let’s open ILDasm and drop your .EXE into it. For the first snippet, we will see something like below: From this given image, we can see ex (Exception class object) has been defined as local variable using .local, but in the catch block, compiler changes the throw statement int

We implement the Finalize method to release the unmanaged resources. First let’s see, what is managed and unmanaged resources. Managed ones are those, which we write in .Net languages. But when we write code in any non .Net language like VB 6 or any windows API, we call it as unmanaged. And there are very high chances that we use any win API or any COM component in our application. So, as managed resources are not managed by CLR, we need to handle them at our own. So, once we are done with unmanaged resources, we need to clean them. The cleanup and releasing of unmanaged is done in Finalize(). If your class is not using any unmanaged resources, then you can forget about Finalize(). But problem is, we can’t directly call Finalize(), we do not have control of it. Then who is going to call this. Basically GC calls this. And one more thing to remember is, there is no Finalize keyword that we will write and implement it. We can define Finalize by defining the Destructor. Destructor is us

Memory leaks in .Net applications are always proven to be the nightmare for developers. Many times we get “OutOfMemoryException”, which is nothing but due to memory leak only. There are many reasons, which lead to memory leak situation. For example, sometimes we forget to release unmanaged resources, dispose heavy objects (i.e., drawing objects), even holding reference of managed objects, longer than necessary can also lead to memory leaks. So, if the application is small, one can analyze the code and figure it out, which object is causing memory leak. But when it comes to a large application, it is not at all possible to figure out manually. In that case, we need some tool, which can help us to figure out the area or object, which is causing memory leak. So, today I surf internet and came up with a tool called .Net Memory Profiler, which can do analysis for us and give us the statistics of all the instances. Ok, instead of getting more into theory, let’s jump quickly to the